Brotherhood losing foothold
today, the muslim brotherhood does not have a politically stable footstep, or an ongoing deep-rooted and secure financial resource or sympathizer in a government in the entire world except only in kuwait, therefore they will be striving to defend their last stronghold, even if they commit crimes against those who attempt to harm or influence them and threaten their interests.
more than an influential person and a senior official in the state security told me that he almost succeeded in penetrating all the state’s systems and bodies in order to protect the homeland’s security and the integrity of the regime from any harm during his work, but he failed to penetrate the brotherhood’s castle.
he warned me and asked me to pay attention to my personal safety, and to refrain from attacking the brotherhood and exposing them, and that the path that i walk through is full of danger. their interests are huge and their account balances are enormous.
they are also linked to higher bodies in more than one regional and world state, and therefore they will not be reluctant to eliminate those who stand in their way.
many, some of whom represent religious groups, often pose questions to liberals about their contradictory positions on the political freedom on one hand and on their attempt to impose a ban on any organization that represents an islamic ideology on the other hand. they see such position a contradiction with the liberal thought that they call for.
we find the answer in the experience of the advanced european nations that, since the end of the second world war, have imposed a kind of ban on several dangerous ideologies such as fascism and nazism which have succeeded in eliminating more than 60 million people.
a well-known friend and publisher says he thought for a moment that it was possible to reach a kind of understanding and political coexistence with the islamic movements and the muslim brotherhood in particular, but it soon became apparent to him that it was not possible mainly after the experience of the rule of muhammad morsi and that the brotherhood wanted democracy to help them to come to power just like others.
they do not believe in a ballot box, or in electoral success and failures. they only believe that they represent the correct heavenly thought. success and failure in other political parties is normal, but it does not apply to an islamic party representing the true religion.
it is also one of the basic principles that the religious party strictly believes in rejecting the idea of absolute equality between men and women without making any concession on this issue. they do not believe in the right of a committed non-muslim to hold senior state positions, as in the army, governor the central bank, leadership position in intelligence service, the parliament and the state, regardless to their talents or rare abilities they have.
if the germans, french, belgians and other citizens who actually represent well established civilization, progress and civil society in their respective countries as true citizens some of these ideologies pose a serious threat to them that can only be contained with the ban, therefore it is a duty for arab societies which lag behind in each field to reject religious parties, whatever their affiliations are.
therefore, the brotherhood’s project to come to power is fascist in nature that should be confronted and banned immediately and permanently. despite the fact that the muslim brotherhood is one of the oldest movements of political islam in modern times and one of the first movements that used violence against its opponents, and established a special apparatus, whose most important priorities were to respond to the opponents of the group through assassination and terrorism.
the movement did not learn anything from their experiences and the experiences of others, and could not cope with the international circumstances, or learn the arts and methods of rule because they know very well that if they begin to indulge and abandon their principles, it will be the beginning of their end, and if they adhere to their principles, it will be impossible for them to come to power and remain there for long.