homosexuality exists in every society on earth, without exception.
ignoring the issue, or trying to sweep it under the carpet, and the absurd demand to annihilate those to whom “homosexuality” applies, is a process that history has proven absurd, and therefore it is necessary to confront it with free and sane discussion.
determining the exact percentage of homosexual individuals among newborns is difficult, due to various factors sexual orientation and determining whether a person is gay or not, is a complex process and determination becomes easier with age affected by a group of genetic, hormonal and environmental factors which more often than not cannot be precisely determined at birth.
research indicates that sexual orientation is not a conscious choice or something that can be influenced or accurately predicted at an early age. however, it is known that there is a percentage of newborns who come to this world and have deformed sexual organs, or they are shared with the opposite sex, and their percentage differs from one society to another, and no society, not even a large family, can claim that it is better than others, and that all of its children are “normal”, sexually, and there is no rejected or defective among them.
in light of this fact, it is very difficult to understand all this attack by some on homosexuals. there is no doubt about their prejudice and their “intentional” ignorance of the scientific facts related to the reason for the existence of individuals who differ sexually, to one degree or another, from the vast majority of human beings, and they live among us, and we know their names and even their high positions, and this has never diminished their performance, or made them non-human!
on the other hand, western societies are swept by a wave of tolerance or indulgence and encouragement of the gay phenomenon. the positions of some countries differ sharply towards them, as there are countries that recognize their existence, and even their right to marry the same sex, and others that sentence them to death. also, amnesty international recognizes the rights of homosexuals, allowing them to donate blood, recognizing the relationships between them, allowing them to adopt, and recognizing them the right to parenthood!
there is no doubt that large and ever-increasing segments, within western and other societies, oppose the idea of expanding the sexual liberation movement with homosexuals. it strongly rejects, to the point of violence, the idea of same-sex marriage, or considering them as the majority. it also strongly rejects the most disturbing tolerance in spreading gay culture, and in the inclusion of “homosexuality” in the school curricula of children under the age of eight, and its impact on their sexual orientations in the future, and our societies, whether we like it or not, will be affected by them, and therefore it is necessary to address this issue in a civilized manner, and closer to humanity.
i have previously expressed, in more than one article, my “understanding and sympathy” with the situation of those belonging to this group, and what they are suffering from the authorities of their countries, especially the islamic ones, but what we are seeing in some western countries, and america in particular, cannot be accepted in any way, and parties are trying to justify it, and make it seem like a kind of reaction to the long years of persecution, killing and ill-treatment that these people have received for centuries and centuries!
the nation’s legislators are called upon to address the lgbt problem in a different way. what some people call for the necessity of “uprooting and annihilating these people” has proven useless, not only recently, but since humanity existed, so what are they doing?
mr. talal abu ghazaleh, the owner of the audit office, expressed his desire, during his meeting with the advisor at the diwan, sheikh faisal al-sabah, to put together a book and a film on kuwait and the role of the al-sabah family, as an expression of his loyalty to our homeland.
we thank mr. abu-ghazaleh for the idea, and we wish him, out of mercy for his life and his age, not to take advantage of the noble goal that he declared, and to interject something from his personal biography into what he intends to do. and if this happens, we will address the issue, through what we know about it, and we have previously touched on it in several articles.
it is also difficult to forget his negative and erroneous predictions, which harmed many at the time!